I’m thinking about a new project, something a little unusual but still with a rich history of information upon which to base the build. On Tindie, I found the RC2014 project which is a build of a Z80 platform but based on some modern components. That got me thinking. My next project must be a Z80 based project.
Why the Z80? Well, it was at one stage the most used CPU in the world, which leads to the great depth of information and experience available for designs, hardware, and software. Technically, it is advanced enough to avoid the need for a large number of ancillary chips, multiple power supplies, and multi-phase clocking that the 8008, 8080, and other older chips needed, but still it is complex enough that in doing a project I’ll feel like I’m actually building a computer.
This year marks 40 years (yes 40 years, since launch in July 1976) of the Z80, and still as a design and platform it looks like it will continue to be relevant into the future. So rather than building yet-another-ARM project. It looks like I will be marking the 40th anniversary of the Z80 with a new build.
What kind of project? The RC2014 project is an interesting starting point. It is quite simple, being a compact and robust implementation of Grant Searle’s 6 Chip Z80 Computer, but provides more resources than most of the 1980’s Z80 projects offer. After looking at some projects others have done, I think that I should aim to build something a little like a “Back to the Future” Z80 project, a DeLorean (which also appeared as a prototype in 1976) with a fusion reactor.
As an outcome I’d like the solution to be able to interact with modern interfaces such as I2C, Ethernet, SPI, and USB, with access to a large physical memory space, with great performance, and yet retain the ability to be a single-step-able experimental platform with LED bus indicators. Single stepping is something that you can’t do with an Arduino, and it is a real differentiation.
Whilst it would be attractive to design in some old-school interface devices, like the Am9511A APU or a Super I/O device, in light of today’s environment the wouldn’t contribute very much to the outcome. So the focus will be squarely on modern I/O.
Also, there is a temptation to build a CP/M system with full disk management. But again there are plenty of CP/M systems around. I’d like to build something more of an embedded platform, that doesn’t require mass storage to run applications. It would be good if most of the basic interfaces could fit on one board, to avoid the need to build address and data bus extension. I think this will simplify the design significantly.
This is going to be an iterative process. The first step will be to build the RC2014 project, and test that I can program it.
It will be important to learn a little about Z80 assembler. Later, I may modify the RC2014 project platform.
Then, I’ll lay out a through hole prototype with minimal functionality, to test some performance ideas. If they work on through hole, then they’ll work with SMD. Using through hole also allows me to quickly fix logic or wiring errors that would take a new spin with SMD.
Finally, I’ll build a SMD device that miniaturizes the solution, and makes it more robust.
The Z80 has been built continuously for 40 years, and in that time many manufacturers have produced silicon and several clones have been created. The Z80 range been continuously improved through the Hitachi 64180, to the Zilog Z180, and the Zilog Aclaim eZ80 devices. Each increment has integrated more accessory components, and improved the instruction throughput, as well as increased the clock rate.
Looking at the options available, the original Z80 requires logic to get started. So rather than building serial ports and timers, it looks like the Z180 might be the right place to start. So why not go all the way to the eZ80? Well the eZ80 is not dissimilar to an AVR ATmega device, with all of the system components integrated into the one device. Using an eZ80 CPU wouldn’t be like building a computer at all. It would be much more like building an Arduino, and I’ve been there already.
Out of the Z180 options, I would select the Z8S180 (at 33MHz) because it integrates sufficient material to get started (Timers, Interrupts, MMU, & USARTs), and leaves me the option to add complexity as I get going.
A little research on the processor and available memory provides me with some cornerstones for the design. I will use Flash memory for the program storage, and static RAM for the system memory. Historically, UV erasable PROM and dynamic RAM would have been used. One advantage of static RAM is that the solution is fully single-step-able. Meaning, I’ll be able to watch the address bus and data bus process each instruction as the Program Counter marches along.
The Z180 can address up to 1MB of physical address space, and it makes sense to provide the full physical memory possible. The price of 1MB of SRAM or of 256kB of Flash is almost nothing these days. As the Z80 logical address space is only 64kB, the Z180 has an inbuilt MMU to manage its physical memory to logical memory mapping.
NOTE 2017 October: The details in the below discussion are no longer accurate. The memory design has moved on substantially, but this discussion remains for information only. Happily, even completely changing the memory mapping can be done with a software reconfiguration of the Memory / IO logic device.
To keep things simple (in hardware), we can use the MMU available in the Z180 to map the physical memory locations on 20 address lines, into logical addresses that suit us. The MMU can map 4kB pages of physical memory into two relocatable logical locations in the Z80 logical address space. These are called the Banked and the Common 1 locations. The Common 0 memory location begins at physical address 0x00000, and continues to the beginning of Banked memory, which then continues to the Common 1 memory address space.
Therefore the hardware (or physical mapping) will show that the 256kB Flash is located from 0x00000 to 0x3FFFF, and the 1MB RAM from 0x00000 to 0xFFFFF but the lower quarter of the RAM address space mostly masked by Flash. For programming we’ll have to move this around.
When the Z80 starts up it always begins from physical and logical address 0x0000. Therefore it is typical to put the program storage in the lower address range, and the RAM in the upper range. Given the use of the MMU available in the Z180 we initially can map the SRAM into the upper 32kB of logical address space, using the Common 1 bank and CBAR setting, leaving the first 32kB of Flash in the lower address range.
One difficulty is that there are only 3 memory spaces available, so if we want to have a C stack, global buffers and queues, and global data, then we need to put some SRAM in the Common 0 address space. Let’s uncover 8kB of 1MB SRAM and place this from 0x2000 to 0x3fff to provide this C stack and global variable data frame.
At some stage I assume I’ll want to use all of the additional Flash and SRAM available, so I’ll have to integrate programming for MMU bank switching, and RAM heap/stack switching when the need arises. At least initially there will be a statically programmable range of between 8kB Flash with 56kB SRAM to 56kB Flash with 8kB SRAM available within the logical address space, depending on the MMU initialisation settings.
To program the Z180 with a soft programmer, the physical memory addresses will need to be juggled around (glue logic) to disable the Flash and SRAM from appearing in the first 8kB Bytes of the address space. The USB soft programmer will provide program codes in the form of a remote boot-loader to load the contents of programs into the Flash, by moving the entire physical flash through a 4kB or 8kB Banked page. SRAM located in the lower 32kB address range will be loaded with a program to enable buffering and page writing of the desired programs.
|Physical Address Range||Run Mode||Programming Mode|
|$00000 – $01FFF||Flash (8,192B of 256kB)||USB (8,192B)|
|$02000 – $03FFF||SRAM (8,192B of 1MB)||SRAM (516,096B of 1MB)|
|$04000 – $3FFFF||Flash (245,760B of 256kB)|
|$40000 – $7FFFF||SRAM (768kB of 1MB)|
|$80000 – $BFFFF||Flash (256kB of 256kB)|
|$C0000 – $FFFFF||SRAM (256kB of 1MB)|
|Logical Address Range||Run Mode||Programming Mode|
|$0000 – $1FFF||Flash (8,192B, Common 0)||USB (8,192B)|
|$2000 – $3FFF||SRAM (8,192B, Common 0)||SRAM (24,576B, Common 0)|
|$4000 – $5FFF||Flash (8,192B, Common 0)|
|$6000 – $7FFF||Flash (8,192B, Banked)|
|$8000 – $FFFF||SRAM (32,768B, Common 1)||Flash (32,768B, Banked)|
The programming mode (address mapping) will be entered by either a button press, or by signalling from the USB – USART interface lines. The process is to invert the Address 19 line, shifting the physical address location of Flash, and mute Address 0-12 to prevent memory being read from these locations, which allows the USB – USART FIFO to provide program opcodes. Mute by disabling the CE on both Flash and SRAM when A13 through A19 are 0. Then configure the MMU to bring the Flash into Banked logical addresses, using the SRAM to buffer 4kB page writes to Flash memory.
Using the ATMEL WinCUPL tool, it is pretty straightforward to convert the above memory mapping and below logic mapping in CUPL language description to JEDEC format that can be handled by a MiniPro TL866 EEPROM & PLD Programming tool, and programmed into an ATF16V8C or Lattice GAL16V8D device.
This memory and IO mapping needs to be augmented by a secondary logic mapping for managing programming, single step, and other functions, which will be programmed into a second ATF16V8C or GAL16V8D device. The logic mapping will allow automatic programming initiation via the FT245R USB interface.
Using EEPLD devices will save significant PCB real estate, and will allow me to compensate for minor logic errors after the fact.
The best Flash memory we can get easily is 55ns timing. This is bettered by SRAM, with 45ns access timing. By converting this timing to a bus frequency we can achieve 20MHz or slightly better, but allowing for some buffering or address logic delay it would be better to keep the system bus under the equivalent of 20MHz.
Using this system bus speed of approximately 20MHz then poses a question; which is the right speed? Some references point out that the Z180 is very poor at holding the correct USART rate when the CPU clock is not a magic multiple of the USART rate. This is the same issue that the AVR ATmega device faces when its USART is not driven by a magic frequency clock. Therefore, lets us set the CPU crystal oscillator to 18.432MHz, being most appropriate magic frequency for the following design.
The Z180 system clock (or PHI) can be double, equivalent, or half the rate of the crystal oscillator base rate. Starting with 18.432MHZ oscillator clock, depending on the CPU Control Register (CCR), the system bus clock (PHI) can be halved and is operated at 9.216MHz. This is slow enough to allow most peripherals to interact with the CPU. Internally, the system bus clock (PHI) can be doubled to operate the CPU at 36.864MHz, by setting both the Clock Multiplier Register (CMR) and the CCR. This rate is slightly overclocking the Z180, but that’s what we live for. We don’t build slow computers.
As we are using 45ns SRAM and 55ns Flash, we will have to insert either 1 or 2 memory wait states when operating at 36.864MHz. This is unavoidable, because of the access speed of both memory devices. Faster SRAM may be available, but faster Flash is quite hard to obtain.
I have been thinking about the whole idea of system modularity. Actually, I don’t think the traditional method of building a backplane is such a good idea for what I want to achieve. Extending the address bus a long distance means that I’ll be investing in design and timing issues, that I’m not really sure I know how to solve. So, let’s focus on a smaller design, with on just one board for the time being.
As a computer always needs to be extended and interact with the real world, I think it would be good to add modern user interfaces to the solution. Use Address 15-13 to provide I/O selection options on the CPU Board, using the remaining output pins from the Memory ATF16V8C or GAL16V8D. This will allow flexibility to latch data into the Hex Display, or trigger breakpoints using #M1 and #Wait to allow Single Step execution from any code point.
|I/O Address Range||Chip Select (A15,A14,A13)||Device|
|$0000 – $1FFF||DO NOT USE ($0, b000)||Internal I/O
$0000 – $00FF Registers
|$2000 – $3FFF||BREAK ($1, b001)||Break Point Toggle Single Step Mode|
|$4000 – $5FFF||#DIO_CS ($2, b010)||PIO 82C55
$4000 – $4003 Registers
|$6000 – $7FFF||EXPANSION ($3, b011)||Hold for Expansion|
|$8000 – $9FFF||#I2C_CS2 ($4, b100)||PCA9665
$8000 – $8003 Registers
|$A000 – $BFFF||#I2C_CS1 ($5, b101)||PCA9665
$A000 – $A003 Registers
|$C000 – $DFFF||#APU_CS ($6, b110)||APU_CS – Am9511A-1
A0 & #WAIT
$C000 – $C001 Registers
|$E000 – $FFFF||EXPANSION ($7, b111)||Hold for Expansion|
Included I/O features & BOM
- Z8S180 33MHz – Digikey 269-4307-ND
- SRAM 45ns 1MB – Digikey 428-3259-ND
- Flash 55ns 256kB – Digikey SST39SF020A-55-4C-NHE-ND
Single Step – The Z-80’s #M1 pin is useful for building logic to single-instruction step the machine. You do this using the memory ready signal on #M1 to clear a 7474 flip-flop, which is clocked by a Single Step signal, to produce a #WAIT signal for the CPU. That stops the machine on the opcode fetch cycle with the address showing on the address bus and the opcode byte showing on the data bus. To move the machine ahead, you clock the flip-flop which releases the #WAIT signal, until the next #M1 clears the 7474 again.
- Switch Debounce MAX6817 – Digikey MAX6817EUT+TCT-ND
- Monostable Multi-vibrator SN74121 – Digikey 296-26367-5-ND
- Edge triggered Flip Flop SN74HC74N – Digikey 296-1602-5-ND
- Switch Debounce MAX6817 – Digikey MAX6817EUT+TCT-ND
- Reset Delay TLC7705 – Digikey 296-3276-5-ND
Memory & Addressing Logic Glue
- Programmable Logic PLD – Digikey ATF16V8B
USB – Flash programming interface
USB – USART interface
- USB-Serial FTDI232RQ
Hex 7 Segment Display – 5x Address Digits – 2x Data Digits
- Decoder DM9368 – Digikey DM9368N-ND
- LED Display VDMY10C0 & VDMG10C0 – Digikey VDMY10C0TR-ND
- LED Display with Decoder TIL311A – eBay only.
General Digital Input / Output – Being able to read and write simple digital levels is an important thing. So let’s include the 82c55 PIO device.
- Intel CMOS 82C55 Programmable IO CP82C55A – Digikey CS82C55AZ-ND
I2C interface – This is the most important interface, which provides many extension options, and a plethora of Grove System sensors. Unfortunately the 5V nature of the system precludes using the newest really fast, deep buffer, devices with multiple bus I2C 1MHz bus interfaces, so provide 2x devices to support different applications (eg. video output and sensor acquisition on separate buses). Use the #INT1 & #INT2 interrupts.
- PCA9665 – Digikey 568-4069-5-ND
Arithmetic Processor Unit – This lovely old chip is now also 40 years old, and was the world’s first APU (or FPU). Potentially, it is too slow to contribute, but still we’ll build it in. Need to provide a 3MHz clock to drive it (FAPU = FCPU/6), and connect its #PAUSE to #WAIT. #END connected to #INT0. RESET is ACTIVE HIGH.
- AMD APU Am9511A-1
- Divide FCPU by 6 for FAPU CLK 3.072MHz SN74LS92N – Digikey 296-26521-5-ND
- Address & Control – Octal Buffer Driver sn74abt541b – Digikey 296-14668-1-ND
- Data – Octal Bus Transceiver sn74abth245 – Digikey 296-4140-1-ND
- SMPS LM2575 for 5V and 12V – Digikey LM2575SX-12/NOPBTR-ND
- Inductor 220uH Pulse PE-52626NL – Digikey 553-1568-5-ND
Excluded I/O features & BOM
Ethernet – Wiznet W5300 Direct address mode requires 3FF of address space. Configure the #INT0 interrupt and implement the DMAC1 I/O to move packets quickly. Exclude this from the initial build, as it is quite a complicated 100 pin device, and it needs 3.3V supply.
- Wiznet W5300 Module – Digikey 1278-1019-ND
USB & SPI interface – provide mass storage capability using either USB or SPI interface devices. The CH37x series is not very well documented, or readily available. There are other options for I2C-SPI bridging which can provide an SPI interface if needed.
ADC interface – Better, higher resolution, faster chips are available with I2C interfaces.
- 8 bit ADC with internal reference MAX158 – Digikey MAX158ACPI+-ND
Video Interface – Can be done using an external I2C device.
- LCD Video – via I2C with a FTDI EVE
Super I/O – Floppy Disk & IDE Controller – Too hard and doesn’t bring much value to the table. Floppy drives are hard to find, and there are already 2x USART ports available on the Z8S180.
- Microchip-Technology FDC37C669-MS – Digikey FDC37C669-MS-ND
Software & References
SASM Softools – Z180 (MMU aware) C compiler. Commercial Licence.
Programming the Z80 by Rodnay Zaks
Hardware Design notes
Well quite a few iterations on my aspirations and thoughts have resulted in a YAZ180_v1 schematic, that I think is now basically frozen. Some of my design decisions follow.
After deciding not to use the TIL311 LED display devices because they are not easily obtainable, I found the alternative solution using the DM9368 display driver chip and LED display devices was very consuming of space on the board. Since the board had to be no greater than a maximum of 10cm by 16cm to fit within the constraints of my Eagle Hobby licence, I decided to buy some TIL311 devices in advance, and then with the comfort of stock in hand I could use them for the design. Also, they add significantly to the retro-chique.
I would have loved to add the Wiznet W5300 device to the design to provide high speed Ethernet capability, but with a 100 pin VLSI it was just too complicated for the initial design. Next time.
I added a 82c55 interface chip. Knowing that it is very slow, requiring 2 wait states to drive it, is one thing. But the advantage of having multiple latch-able input and output ports, off one fairly compact integrated device made up for that problem. As it is a 1970s device it is also retro-chique accretive.
Designing using CUPL and the Atmel or Lattice PLDs is in my opinion much simpler than tracing schematics and thinking through 7400 series NOR, NAND gates to get the desired addressing logic. Writing the logic in “c” like syntax is much less taxing on the brain.
After deciding to implement no bus drivers, and then building a solution adding drivers and termination to every address and data line, I have rationalised down to bus drivers on data, lower address, and control lines. These are the few lines that appear on all memory and I/O devices, and are taken to every point on the board. The upper address lines only appear on the PLD, SRAM, and Flash, which are very low load modern devices, so there is no point to buffer them. Using ABT logic limits the differential delay on the address lines to 2 ns, and since the read and write select lines are also buffered, there is no issue timing issue created.
And here is the first schematic, in pdf YAZ180_V1. Errors and omissions did occur.
Hardware Layout notes
With the first major layout session behind me, I have the following notes.
Change the SN74ABT244 for the SN74ABT541. The only difference is the pin ordering, with the 244 being optimal for counter-flowing signals, and the 541 being optimal for unidirectional signals (physically). This will help layout.
Getting 20 address lines and 8 data lines to appear on the SMD SRAM memory is challenging. I will probably reassign the address lines to suit the Z8S180 pin-out, rather than spending hours untangling the lines. It won’t be too easy to do this with the Flash device, but as it is in a PLCC through-hole socket it comes inherently with “vias” making reaching it half as hard as SMD.
Input pin and I/O pins on Z8S180 include weak latch circuits to prevent excessive current draw by the receiver, if the pin is not externally driven. External pull-up or pull-down resistors should not be less than 15 kOhms to ensure that the resistors can control the state of the latch when power is supplied.
Following about 10 hours of juggling, just two wires remain together with a plan to resolve them tomorrow.
Finished, except for the detailed checking, which usually results in some changes. But, it is done.
The screen grabs below show with the Vcc Layer in Grey, and GND Layer in Green. I have added some basic traces on those layers to close off the routing, which are misleading. The layers are actually completely filled, normally.
Bill of Materials
Well, building this retro-computing machine is not quite as cheap as an ATMEL micro-controller board. But then again, it is not quite in the same league, with 1MB of RAM, and 256kB of Flash storage, together with an APU and 9 digits of LED display.
I have ordered all of the components, except the Am9511A-1 APU and the TIL311 LED display devices, from Digikey. The BOM is detailed in this link. To add to BOM, this there are the Am9511A-1 and the TIL311 devices which can be found on eBay or other auction sites.
Bringing up the Prototype
The build and bringing up of the board will continue, once I get the new SMD oven sorted out.
Well, the board has been soldered, and everything looks good. The SMD oven wasn’t as useful as I thought. It turns out that I can solder the fine pitch of the SRAM and FTDI devices fairly well with a normal soldering iron.
My PLD programmer won’t work with ATMEL devices, so I’ve been waiting so long for some Lattice GAL devices to be shipped to me. Over 8 weeks in transit. Finally they’ve landed. So I soldered the rest of the board together.
I’ll have to debug my CUPL programming of the GALs to get everything working, but at least there’s no “magic smoke”.
The TIL311 LEDs are very hot, because they draw so much current. LEDs really have come a long way in efficiency over the past 30 years.
Update 9 Jan 2017. Using this Github Repo, I’ve successfully sent characters to the ASCI. It lives!
Update Friday, January 13th 2017. Initial RAM testing passed!
And now based on this testing, I’ve been able to get the ASCI0 (and ASCI1) working, so that I have NASCOM BASIC Ver 4.7 (1978) running on my 2016 designed computer!
This is a Mandelbrot program running in NASCOM Basic v4.7.
Completing the “in circuit programming” tools, to programme the Flash memory without removing it.
Writing drivers for the Intel 82C55 PIO device.
Writing drivers for the AMD Am9511A APU device.
Next up, programming Flash memory using the FTDI FT245 USB-Parallel port. This was working, but some bad soldering made the on-board FT245 inoperable. Testing was completed using an external device.
Testing for the 82C55 PIO device is now done. It can do a lot more than this, but the proof of life is completed. Time to move on.
Update February 20, 2017. Despite initial misgivings, that the Am9511A APU was wired incorrectly, the proof of life for the APU is now done.
For a long time, I could see that the APU was trying, but just wasn’t making it. Two issues were involved.
Firstly, all of the datasheets assume 74 logic is being used to create the chip select from 3 to 8 address decoding, or similar solutions. What they don’t point out is that the Am9511A APU chip select MUST be generated from the address lines, because the Z80 (Z180) IORQ line has incorrect timing to drive the Am9511A. The Am9511A needs an 30ns of chip select and address validity after WR is raised, which the Z80 IORQ timing doesn’t provide. Having infinite logic in a GAL available, I had (incorrectly) included the IORQ line in the APU_CS logic. Whilst I’d recognised the issue, it took three lines in an obscure 1981 PhD dissertation to focus the spotlight of clarity. Thank you Mr Haining.
Secondly, the Am9511A samples I have on hand won’t work at 3.072MHz. I guess they were cutting very close to the limit in the day.
I’ve finished an initial revision of the PCB to fix all of the known errata. I’ll sit on it a bit until I can double check that everything is good.
The power supply section was done very simply in the V1 build. I underestimated the requirement for 5V power, thinking that 1A should be sufficient. Before I built the V1 board I realised my error and replaced the 5V 1A regulator with a AP1506 that can supply 3A. I also changed the inductor to a lower inductance and higher current version.
I’ve now revised the power supply section to use LM2596 3A device for the 5V supply, as this device has a larger input voltage range (up to 40V) , and I have inserted thermal vias to improve the heat spreading into the back side of the board.
The 12V supply only needs to provide about 90mA for the APU. I’ve reduced the capacity of the regulator down to 500mA, and have saved some space by using a LM2674 in SOIC-8 format. Whilst the Am9511A gets uncomfortably warm, the power supply doesn’t.
Also, I simply forgot to provide a 3.3V supply, that is required for the I2C interface devices. So this has been repaired with a 1117 linear regulator, supplied by the 5V regulator. It is the same device I used in the Goldilocks Analogue as I have some parts in hand.
I’ve swapped the USB connectors to male versions. Can’t understand why I built YAZ180 V1 with female connectors. Just silly.
I’ve swapped the location of the RESET and SINGLE_STEP buttons. It makes more sense to have the buttons doing the same function closer together.
The Z8S180 requires that its DCD0 be held low, before the USART0 can transmit. This pin is now tied to GND.
The Logic GAL device, in Registered Mode, requires to have its OE held low. This pin is now tied to GND.
To generate a RESET signal, the reset request input to the Logic GAL can’t be on Pin1 in Registered Mode, so the RESET_REQ signal was moved to Pin14. Pin1 in Registered Mode is connected exclusively to the CLK for the GAL flip-flops. In order to clock the flip-flop implemented in the YAZ180 programming mode logic, the RESET line was connected to Pin1.
The Am9511A-1 although specified at 3MHz, doesn’t pass tests at 3.072MHz. So it will have to be de-rated to 1:8 from the Z8S180 system clock. This takes the clock speed down to 2.304MHz. The clock divider chip will be replaced by a sn74ls93 from Digikey 296-3749-5-ND.
For the purposes of enjoyment, I’ve connected the Z8S180 DMA engine DREQ1 and TEND1 lines to the Am9511A SVREQ and SVACK lines. The SVREQ requires a NOT to generate the inverted Z8S180 signal for DREQ1. Although there are very few bytes loaded into the Am9511A, this should allow them to be written by the DMA engine.
Both AMD Am9511A and Intel 82C55 need the address and chip select lines to remain valid for a period after the RD or WR signal has gone high. Therefore we need to remove the existence of a valid IORQ signal from the calculation of their select line, and just rely purely on their address decoding (and absence of MREQ). The CUPL coding has been adjusted
The Am9511A supports 1 I/O Wait State, as RD & WR to Pause is 100ns. The 82C55 requires 2 I/O Wait states, as RD is 200ns minimum.
Update February 24th.
The new PCB has been ordered.
I’ll start a new post for the YAZ180 V2 when the PCB is back from manufacturing.
8 thoughts on “Yet Another Z180 Project (YAZ180)”
I chose the EZ80190, specifically because I wanted a Z80 system with modern peripherals. I have built a number of traditional minimum Z80 systems – but the PIO, SIO, CTC are getting less easy to get in DIL package and more expensive. It’s a lot of wiring to get a full system prototyped. So my effort will be focussed at putting an EZ80190 chip on a DIL/Breadboard compatible breakout board.
I have chosen to retain Spencer Owen’s RC2014 40 pin SIL bus format – so anything I create can be used with his system. The bigger the Z80 community following – the better.
My recent experiments resurrecting a Z80 board I built in 1985 are blogged here:
One approach is to strap an ARM Cortex to the Z80 bus – and use the ARM to act as the system RAM and the peripherals – like in this Teensy-Z80 combo from @Domipheus
Planning on using my FT812 board – driving a VGA monitor – for output to the large screen. Also opens up the Z80 to GameDuino type applications.
I’ve been putting off the question of an SPI interface for the YAZ180. It is really the one interface that doesn’t seem to be canned for Z80. I2C, USART, ISA are all there, but not SPI.
SPI is the one reason why I’m continuing to consider one of the eZ80 devices.
But, I think the absence of SPI can be worked around. Most requirements can be resolved by I2C or USART.
The eZ80 hits all my performance buttons, but to me doesn’t seem sufficiently differentiated from YAA (Yet another Atmel, Yet another ARM) solutions, to make it intriguing to build something. Surely there’s enough SOC solutions already?
Never the less, I will probably buy one when you finish it. 🙂
I do like the FTDI EVE Video adapters. I’ve used them on AVR boards, and have designed a neat GUI for a Synthesiser.
Pingback: Z80 C code development with Eclipse and z88dk | feilipu
We just began publishing z88dk on git.
You surely know we do our best to accept any code contribution 😉
Certainly. I’ve some rc2014 updates to make immediately.
I’ll start a yaz180 target quite soon too.
Thanks for reading. 😀
Pingback: Characterising Am9511A-1 APU | feilipu
Pingback: Yet Another Z180 – Version 2 | feilipu
Hi ggreat reading your blog